{"id":9842,"date":"2026-09-20T18:00:10","date_gmt":"2026-09-20T16:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/?p=9842"},"modified":"2026-09-20T18:26:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-20T16:26:40","slug":"vendre-catalogue-musical","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/2026\/09\/20\/vendre-catalogue-musical\/","title":{"rendered":"Sell a music catalogue: documents and rights to prepare"},"content":{"rendered":"<article class=\"tlcp-article\">\n<header class=\"tlcp-hero\"><span class=\"tlcp-kicker\">TuneLockr Guide \u00b7 Catalogue<\/span><\/p>\n<h1>Sell a music catalogue: documents and rights to prepare<\/h1>\n<p class=\"tlcp-lead\">Before a transfer, gather titles, masters, works, contracts, revenues, disputes and restrictions to enable the audit.<\/p>\n<div class=\"tlcp-actions\"><a class=\"tlcp-btn\" href=\"https:\/\/app.tunelockr.com\/depot\">Prepare my catalogue \u2197<\/a><a class=\"tlcp-btn is-ghost\" href=\"\/en\/monetiser-sa-musique\/\">See the main guide<\/a><\/div>\n<p class=\"tlcp-offer\">First registration free \u00b7 no bank card required<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"tlcp-body\">\n<p><strong>Sell music catalogue<\/strong> here refers to a concrete process: identifying the correct rights holders, defining the intended use or evidence required, formalising decisions and keeping the elements that will help understand the agreement later. This method avoids vague promises and reduces misunderstandings between artists, producers, labels, publishers, and users.<\/p>\n<p>TuneLockr helps creators organise their files, evidence, and permissions. The tool does not replace a collecting society or personalised legal advice. The information below is educational and should be tailored to the project, territory, and any existing contracts.<\/p>\n<h2>Sell music catalogue: the four key structural decisions<\/h2>\n<div class=\"tlcp-grid\">\n<article class=\"tlcp-card\">\n<h3>Scope sold<\/h3>\n<p>Clearly define the sold scope and connect this decision to the relevant files, people, and dates.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<article class=\"tlcp-card\">\n<h3>Ownership titles<\/h3>\n<p>Document ownership titles with verifiable elements rather than just a simple statement.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<article class=\"tlcp-card\">\n<h3>Financial history<\/h3>\n<p>Frame the financial history so that each party understands what is allowed, expected or excluded.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<article class=\"tlcp-card\">\n<h3>Warranties and exclusions<\/h3>\n<p>Keep a record of warranties and exclusions to explain the choices made and how they have changed.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tlcp-note\"><strong>Point of attention on selling a music catalogue.<\/strong> Don't confuse identification, evidence, ownership, and permission. A code, a deposit, a dated file or a detection documents a specific aspect; no single element answers all questions.<\/div>\n<h2>Implement the sale of a music catalogue, step by step<\/h2>\n<h3>1. Map out the people and assets<\/h3>\n<p>Start by naming the work, the recording, the exact version, and the relevant files. Add the authors, composers, performers, producers, publishers, or relevant representatives. This mapping prevents a decision made about the master from being mistakenly applied to the composition, or vice versa.<\/p>\n<h3>2. Describe the requirement using verifiable parameters<\/h3>\n<p>Replace general wording with observable parameters: uses, media, territory, duration, exclusivity, volumes, permitted modifications, recipients, and termination conditions. When the project changes, create a new version of the agreement or the record instead of quietly altering the history.<\/p>\n<h3>3. Check existing documents<\/h3>\n<p>Review contracts, mandates, licences, split sheets, statements, invoices, and relevant exchanges. Prior authorisation, management mandates, or exclusivity may affect your room for manoeuvre. Where important stakes are involved, a professional analysis ensures a reliable interpretation.<\/p>\n<h3>4. Keep an accessible record<\/h3>\n<p>Archive the final version, attachments, date, identity of the people who validated, and the corresponding files. Use a consistent naming convention and save everything in a location separate from the place of creation.<\/p>\n<div class=\"tlcp-checklist\"><strong>Checklist before approval<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sold scope identified<\/li>\n<li>Ownership titles documented<\/li>\n<li>Financial history validated<\/li>\n<li>Warranties and exclusions archived<\/li>\n<li>Responsible persons, dates, and next steps specified<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Integrate selling the music catalogue into the exit cycle<\/h2>\n<h3>Before finalisation<\/h3>\n<p>Bring together the people involved while creative and commercial choices are still easy to explain. For the 'sold scope', assign a responsible person and set a validation date. This early stage takes less time than searching for documents a few months after the release.<\/p>\n<h3>Upon delivery<\/h3>\n<p>Create a reference folder containing the approved export, metadata, agreements, contact details, and a summary of decisions taken. Do not overwrite old versions: archive them with a clear status. This will allow you to show which file was delivered, when, and under what conditions.<\/p>\n<h3>During use<\/h3>\n<p>Monitor any divergence between the intended scope and the actual use. A campaign might extend, a video may be re-edited, a partner may change, or a new platform might arise. The aim is not to block all change but to identify when a new approval or extension becomes necessary.<\/p>\n<h3>At closure or renewal<\/h3>\n<p>Note the definitive end, the files returned or deleted, the amounts paid, and any possible extensions. A brief review creates a reliable record and improves future agreements. For a catalogue, apply the same framework to each title in order to make decisions comparable.<\/p>\n<h2>How to assess the quality of the mechanism?<\/h2>\n<p>To sell a music catalogue, a good file is <strong>understandable<\/strong> by someone who was not involved in the discussions, <strong>traceable<\/strong> thanks to consistent files and dates, <strong>proportionate<\/strong> to the value of the use and <strong>reversible<\/strong> when the authorisation comes to an end. These criteria are more useful than a stack of unrelated documents.<\/p>\n<p>Test your organisation with a simple scenario: if the project manager is absent, can someone else identify the correct version, know who makes decisions, find the proof and understand what is permitted? If the answer is no, add an index or an overview sheet rather than multiplying the number of folders.<\/p>\n<h2>International project: additional checks<\/h2>\n<p>International exploitation requires checking territories, languages, intermediaries, and the applicable law. Terms and formalities are not identical everywhere. Therefore, avoid presenting a French model as universal. For significant operations, have the scope confirmed by a professional familiar with the relevant countries and consult the resources of the [organisation].<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wipo.int\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">World Intellectual Property Organization<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Example of a properly defined decision<\/h2>\n<div class=\"tlcp-example\">\n<p>A workable decision answers five questions: <strong>who<\/strong> authorises or declares, <strong>which file<\/strong> is involved, <strong>for what use<\/strong>, <strong>for how long<\/strong> and <strong>with what compensation or proof<\/strong>. If any of these answers is missing, add it before sharing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Common mistakes to avoid<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Using a template without adapting it to the actual project.<\/li>\n<li>Treating the work and the master as a single asset.<\/li>\n<li>Forgetting a co-author, a producer or a previous licence.<\/li>\n<li>Granting exclusivity without a defined duration or precise territory.<\/li>\n<li>Only keep isolated screenshots, without source files or context.<\/li>\n<li>Present a detection or identifier as absolute proof.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Sources and guidance<\/h2>\n<p>To explore further, consult the official resources of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sacem.fr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SACEM<\/a>. Texts and practices evolve: check the applicable version at the time of your project.<\/p>\n<section class=\"tlcp-faq\">\n<h2>Frequently asked Questions<\/h2>\n<details>\n<summary>Is the sold scope enough to secure the project?<\/summary>\n<p>No. The scope sold must be linked to the rights, contracts, files and decisions that provide its context.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>When should ownership titles be checked?<\/summary>\n<p>Before initial release, and then with each significant change of version, partner, territory, or purpose.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary>Does TuneLockr replace legal advice?<\/summary>\n<p>No. TuneLockr organises evidence, files, and permissions; tailored analysis may still be needed.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/section>\n<aside class=\"tlcp-eco\">\n<div><span>Contracts &amp; legal framework<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Need a document tailored to your situation?<\/h2>\n<p>Access templates and resources dedicated to music professionals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/musilaw.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Discover MusiLaw \u2197<\/a><\/aside>\n<aside class=\"tlcp-related\"><span class=\"tlcp-related-kicker\">TuneLockr Rights<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Protect your music before sharing it.<\/h2>\n<p>Create proof linked to this version of your work, then find your licences and your usage in one unified process. Dive deeper with the <a href=\"\/en\/monetiser-sa-musique\/\">main catalogue guide<\/a> or <a href=\"\/en\/protect-my-music-2\/\">complementary guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"tlcp-actions\"><a class=\"tlcp-btn\" href=\"https:\/\/app.tunelockr.com\/depot\">Create my proof \u2197<\/a><a class=\"tlcp-btn is-ghost\" href=\"\/en\/tunnel-locker-pricing\/\">See offers<\/a><\/div>\n<p class=\"tlcp-offer\">First registration free \u00b7 no bank card required<\/p>\n<\/aside><\/div>\n<\/article>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before a transfer, gather titles, masters, works, contracts, revenues, disputes and restrictions to enable the audit.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9843,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-droits-preuves"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9842"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9842\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9895,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9842\/revisions\/9895"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tunelockr.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}